Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    1:51 AM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Voting poll discussion > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: [Poll: 2012.18]: Should backup cameras be mandatory standard equipment in all ... Post a Reply Back to Topics
JT

Moderator
Message Posted: Apr 28, 2012 9:01:00 PM

Should backup cameras be mandatory standard equipment in all vehicles?
Yes
No
No opinion

Post your thoughts about this poll below.
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
grandmacbc
Champion Author Buffalo

Posts:6,525
Points:1,427,850
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 4:32:06 AM

It's more dangerous to park a sedan next an SUV or Van because you can't see around them and vehicles passing you in parking lots can't see you because your vehicle is shorter than ones next to you! Don't see where backup cameras would help this. Should be areas reserved for sedans in parking lots like in parking ramps.
Profile Pic
Ziggy1962
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:5,736
Points:1,809,670
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 3:03:51 AM

No.
Profile Pic
pkhdonovan
Champion Author Maine

Posts:12,001
Points:2,703,105
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: May 5, 2012 2:05:04 AM

no
Profile Pic
NavyStore
Champion Author Seattle

Posts:3,860
Points:2,074,495
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:16:01 PM

To many people back up and don't look where they are going, causing lots of accidents.
Profile Pic
cssco
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:7,321
Points:1,749,805
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:54:20 PM

Way too costly.
Profile Pic
dongo50
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:14,684
Points:2,379,070
Joined:Jul 2006
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:32:46 PM

no
Profile Pic
ranger1169
Champion Author Harrisburg

Posts:2,961
Points:510,965
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:26:57 PM

no
Profile Pic
rescuer
Veteran Author Las Vegas

Posts:322
Points:61,005
Joined:Nov 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:40:44 PM

Get the drunks off the road then talk to me about paying for another expense to save .0002 lives per year.
Profile Pic
02goldwing
Rookie Author Illinois

Posts:79
Points:629,080
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:29:13 PM

G.O.A.L

Get Out And Look!
Profile Pic
RxHugh
Champion Author Greensboro

Posts:7,597
Points:1,572,985
Joined:Feb 2003
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:19:43 PM

y
Profile Pic
akamaikiwi
Rookie Author New York

Posts:12
Points:29,125
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:53:28 PM

No, the backup sensor is sufficient. Perhaps the backup sensor should be standard on all cars.
Profile Pic
Bonanza
Champion Author Boston

Posts:12,075
Points:2,549,055
Joined:Jun 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:03:21 PM

Yes
Profile Pic
Wingking32
Rookie Author South Carolina

Posts:1
Points:8,995
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:43:47 PM

Sorry Big Blue but I'm far from lazy. Had it not been for the one on my car a 3 yr old precious little girl would likely been a fatality when she darted out from behind the van parked beside me in a local Target parking lot. For safety, make them mandatory and remove the cd/DVD to offset the cost.
Profile Pic
BAJALRRP
Veteran Author Tacoma

Posts:431
Points:1,262,135
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:38:40 PM

It should NOT be mandated.
Profile Pic
skanytank
Champion Author Kentucky

Posts:1,236
Points:557,175
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:26:53 PM

it's a decent option but not sure it must be mandated, like others said, if you want it then pay for it, simple enough...
Profile Pic
ladymoondance
Rookie Author Raleigh

Posts:53
Points:280,690
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 4:14:30 PM

Should NOT be mandatory.
Profile Pic
wimpy
Rookie Author Michigan

Posts:1
Points:370
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:13:14 PM

yes, backup cameras should be mandatory, its a safety issues.
Profile Pic
BigBlue5
All-Star Author Spokane

Posts:663
Points:134,235
Joined:Apr 2010
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 1:44:42 PM

No, Putting backup cameras in all vehicles is a waste of money. They go against what we learned in drivers school - Turn your head and look!
What's wrong with that. Cameras are for lazy people.
Profile Pic
chui
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:2,902
Points:2,365,555
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 1:38:00 PM

yes............
Profile Pic
AlTraveler
All-Star Author Alabama

Posts:596
Points:1,210,870
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:18:10 PM

yes
Profile Pic
Maka1
Rookie Author Honolulu

Posts:4
Points:178,430
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:13:53 PM

no
Profile Pic
nordlead
Veteran Author Syracuse

Posts:295
Points:118,865
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 12:05:45 PM

no, since they are 2D displays. You can't see how far away whatever it is that you are going to run over, only that it is there. They will also be low resolution. Both of those factors make human eyes looking out the rear window vastly superior. We should pass a law that says you have to look out the rear window instead.
Profile Pic
Terdburner
Champion Author Idaho

Posts:5,398
Points:167,530
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:45:30 AM

Mandatory. Now. My beaver insists only those who disagree will have to pay for it.
Profile Pic
mkohly
Veteran Author Chicago

Posts:263
Points:24,245
Joined:Sep 2009
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 11:33:25 AM

Should NOT be mandatory!

If you need it, pay for the option, but don't force everyone to buy something they don't need.

I almost never use reverse: I get to work while the parking lot is empty and call always drive into my spot, then drive out while going forward on the way home. The house has a circular drive-way so no need to ever go backwards.
Profile Pic
Alturki83
Rookie Author San Diego

Posts:1
Points:2,170
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:58:51 AM

yes, it is easier and saver than not to have one.
Profile Pic
Pspeed
Champion Author Baltimore

Posts:7,139
Points:928,260
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:39:24 AM

Yes, definitely. Since I only drive backwards anyway. Now I won't have to turn by head.
Profile Pic
keo
Champion Author Colorado

Posts:10,245
Points:2,032,890
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 10:24:08 AM

no
Profile Pic
ricebike
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:10,026
Points:1,854,745
Joined:Oct 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:41:17 AM

as a fedex driver, it's a very good tool for safety

i saw a kid jump on the back bumper step when I started the van; scanned all mirrors and saw him on the camera... immediately i opened the back door and scared him off :P
Profile Pic
leveit2clever
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:7,246
Points:451,635
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 9:08:03 AM

Yup. And jumper rods with jato assist underneath the car for unexpected crevasses. And air tight seals with a pop-up snorkel so you can drive underwater.
Profile Pic
elmo_good
Rookie Author Wilmington

Posts:1
Points:120
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:46:19 AM

Cameras no, ultrasonic detectors are part of many new cars, if you want protection there are radar units available. More electronic gadgets to distract drivers. from the ad above: Rear-View Camera Kits $79.99 LCD Monitor & Color Backup. System w/Nightvision. Order Online! If you feel the need buy one but as for me no. how many people are going to be injured due to watching the camera instead of paying attention to the act of driving? What next mandate Heads Up Displays? I love the mandated air pressure monitors, like you don't know when your tires are low or flat, duh. Get out and inspect your car. Walk around it and look at it for those that don't have a clue.

Like the man said "Common sense is so uncommon."

elmo_good
Profile Pic
oolalaa
Rookie Author San Jose

Posts:6
Points:91,595
Joined:Jan 2002
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:25:18 AM

No, because it adds cost and it's hard to use. You can't use it to steer in my experience so you're looking at your mirrors, not the camera. The alarms are better becuse you hear the obstruction (pole, pet, child) and can stop before you hit.
Profile Pic
RevDrCBJ
Veteran Author Ann Arbor

Posts:363
Points:187,010
Joined:Jul 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:20:00 AM

Should be optional equipment
Profile Pic
HFAJR0034
Champion Author New Mexico

Posts:6,425
Points:1,164,835
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:15:58 AM

yes
Profile Pic
Lengas
Champion Author Gary

Posts:13,540
Points:2,715,825
Joined:Nov 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 8:08:49 AM

Yes definitely
Profile Pic
dwgmeg
Rookie Author Ontario

Posts:1
Points:3,480
Joined:Apr 2012
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:55:30 AM

i had back up alarms on my van when i purchased it and decided to put a back-upcamera on my truck it was a god send as it help helped on many occasions where i could of hurt somebody or animal many times
Profile Pic
N9HVP
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:11,703
Points:2,469,665
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 7:32:36 AM

Yes.
Profile Pic
Kana
All-Star Author New York

Posts:508
Points:162,670
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 6:41:38 AM

Mandatory b|u cameras, No.
many of the available options on today's vehicle are for for the occupants comfort or convenience. These options also add to the price of the vehicle.
B\u camera's are a benefit on some larger vehicle such as mini vans.

B\u alarms are an effective warning device and less expensive than cameras. When you learn to drive you are taught to make sure the area is clear\unobstructed before backing-up. Just the same as your supposed to check your mirrors and use turn signals before changing lanes.

If your vehicle is equipped with a b\u camera or blind spot monitors, etc. and you still have an accident. Are you more liable for failing to use the devices?
Profile Pic
AlTraveler
All-Star Author Alabama

Posts:596
Points:1,210,870
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 5:57:59 AM

yes
Profile Pic
OKRifle
Champion Author Oklahoma City

Posts:10,397
Points:1,808,560
Joined:Oct 2007
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 5:50:35 AM

No
Profile Pic
SSchmidty
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:9,338
Points:1,775,255
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 5:24:58 AM

It's all about more safety not less!
Profile Pic
BaLakov100
Rookie Author Missouri

Posts:6
Points:550,550
Joined:Oct 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:47:52 AM

No
Profile Pic
TxJeans
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:3,532
Points:368,155
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:42:36 AM

Nope, not mandatory. They may be nice options and market will drive price and they will likely be standard in the future. For those that think these will save lives, it isn't that simple. Too many electronics and distractions already. There are too many that are just going around in a fog and will stare blankly at the screen and ignore other sensory input around them. A camera takes active utilization by the person, just like walking around their car and using their mirrors. You cannot legislate away stupidity or accidents.

Back up sensors would do more and may break through the fog of today's distracted drivers.

Parents need to also take more responsibility with their kids. Period. Folks keep talking about the 22 month in FL. Well, that accident might have happened even with a camera - a kid running behind a car can happen too fast for someone to respond to regardless of a camera. That mother should have had that 22 month old firmly in tow. She was distracted and went back to her car letting the kid wander off in a busy parking lot.

BUC (at the level that would be mandated) would not be of great quality. They do not have good depth of view, and do not cover all "potential" risks of backing up. Folks will rely on them rather than good common sense and their full set of senses as they focus on a screen INSIDE their car and not see the big picture.

They are a tool that can be used to help, or a tool that can be used improperly and add more risk. Leave them to those that want to pay for them, and hopefully, they will be the ones to use them properly.
Profile Pic
ranger1169
Champion Author Harrisburg

Posts:2,961
Points:510,965
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:40:25 AM

no
Profile Pic
dongo50
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:14,684
Points:2,379,070
Joined:Jul 2006
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:25:56 AM

no
Profile Pic
cigarman409
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:4,426
Points:1,824,685
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:23:19 AM

optional only
Profile Pic
cigarman409
Champion Author Massachusetts

Posts:4,426
Points:1,824,685
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 3:22:51 AM

no
Profile Pic
Ziggy1962
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:5,736
Points:1,809,670
Joined:Aug 2006
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 2:04:49 AM

No.
Profile Pic
pkhdonovan
Champion Author Maine

Posts:12,001
Points:2,703,105
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: May 4, 2012 2:04:42 AM

no
Profile Pic
ranger1169
Champion Author Harrisburg

Posts:2,961
Points:510,965
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 9:38:00 PM

no
Profile Pic
tc17a
Rookie Author South Carolina

Posts:56
Points:357,845
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 9:15:20 PM

No
Profile Pic
naw
Champion Author Denver

Posts:3,610
Points:490,615
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 8:05:15 PM

Yes. How many times do you hear on your local news that someone had backed over a toddler and said "I didn't know he/she was there!"
Profile Pic
JABiii
Rookie Author Shreveport

Posts:1
Points:21,795
Joined:Jun 2006
Message Posted: May 3, 2012 7:32:13 PM

The only time rear view cameras should be required is when the driver's view is consistently blocked by the structure of the vehicle. Ultrasonic proximity alarms such as on many minivans and SUVs would provide adequate protection for the alert driver from items in the pathway of the vehicle.
Post a reply Back to Topics