rjr54

Champion Author
Winnipeg
Posts:1,115 Points:395,370 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 12, 2013 9:59:00 PM
The eastern provinces are like the Americans, they don't want Canadian oil.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2013 9:09:56 AM
Wouldn't a pipeline to the east coast make more sense, so Canadian refineries could use less imported oil?
|
rjr54

Champion Author
Winnipeg
Posts:1,115 Points:395,370 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 10, 2013 7:16:41 AM
No. I don't think the USA actually wants Canadian crude oil.
I think Canada should build the Northern Gateway pipeline instead so the construction jobs stay here. And then sell our crude to China; they definitely want it.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 6, 2013 3:48:40 PM
What makes you think that the little bit that hasn't been approved will do anything to help the economy or jobs?
|
kglazier67

Rookie Author
Illinois
Posts:2 Points:555,880 Joined:Nov 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 5, 2013 8:48:43 PM
Yes, as originally proposed. Come Obama - let it be built to help the economy and jobs situation!
|
sonicmustang

All-Star Author
Alberta
Posts:637 Points:149,375 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Jan 7, 2013 4:22:25 AM
Yes, as originally proposed
|
achung53

Veteran Author
Orange County
Posts:487 Points:85,225 Joined:Oct 2012
|
Message Posted: Dec 21, 2012 9:54:51 AM
Yes, as originally proposed
|
Minka12

Rookie Author
Los Angeles
Posts:1 Points:600 Joined:Oct 2012
|
Message Posted: Oct 23, 2012 10:49:37 PM
as originally proposed
|
bill294

All-Star Author
Chicago
Posts:565 Points:384,700 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 28, 2012 5:09:18 AM
Yes, as orginally proposed
|
pricewar

Champion Author
Ogden
Posts:2,080 Points:302,715 Joined:Jul 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 28, 2012 1:09:17 AM
ok
|
fhnorth

Sophomore Author
Nevada
Posts:129 Points:26,590 Joined:Jul 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2012 9:20:05 PM
Yes, but with some other conditions
|
gizmojoe

Sophomore Author
Ontario
Posts:215 Points:278,355 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 12, 2012 7:20:22 PM
Yes, yes, yes!!
|
ggg452

Champion Author
Manitoba
Posts:1,713 Points:360,460 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 8, 2012 9:02:42 AM
ok
|
Ferdman17

Champion Author
Albany
Posts:1,430 Points:402,985 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 28, 2012 2:31:25 PM
Yes, as originally proposed
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 12, 2012 9:11:13 PM
Why build it? It would only create a few jobs. And most of the energy will be exported.
|
gaspumpin

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:1,792 Points:416,695 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 12, 2012 11:18:19 AM
YES! Build it! Jobs, jobs, jobs. Energy, energy, energy.
|
s90201

Rookie Author
Long Island
Posts:57 Points:17,215 Joined:Jun 2012
|
Message Posted: Jun 27, 2012 7:25:36 AM
Yes it should be built, it would be a good thing for the country
|
Sumflow

Rookie Author
Honolulu
Posts:65 Points:400 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: May 14, 2012 3:35:43 AM
Pipeline is OK, route is not. Why not run next to existing line?
The only reason they want to go border to border is to take advantage of Texas tax treatments. Give them the special tax up north and refine it up there.
|
twopairAL

All-Star Author
Huntsville
Posts:587 Points:128,610 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: May 11, 2012 11:06:33 AM
One: it will put people to work two: it will get them off unemployment and it will help put money back into the tax system
|
Summerwine

Rookie Author
Twin Cities
Posts:9 Points:1,460 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 26, 2012 8:07:17 AM
Yes, as originally proposed
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 18, 2012 10:01:58 AM
NO IT SHOULDN'T
|
HFAJR0034

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:6,611 Points:1,195,460 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 18, 2012 4:02:39 AM
YES IT SHOULD
|
crazy49920

Rookie Author
Green Bay
Posts:1 Points:220 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 14, 2012 12:46:24 PM
judging from what i read the only reason the pipeline is considered for the u.s. is because canadians wont allow the pipeline to be built in their own country and it wont lower gas prices at all were using less gas now than 4 or 5 years ago the refineries are selling the excess gas they make to other country's right now as i see it the speculators are the ones making the price go up i think the best way to control the oil market is to take it off the market and make it a law that only the oil refineries can buy crude oil not the big money banks keeping the price as high as it is
|
MOPARTECH

Rookie Author
North Carolina
Posts:8 Points:1,075 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 8, 2012 8:10:18 PM
YES it should. it will provide jobs for americans.
|
Mekuru

Rookie Author
West Virginia
Posts:11 Points:83,650 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Mar 10, 2012 12:21:29 PM
i dont know enough to decide correctly
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2012 9:12:53 PM
gmac718 - "How can have more oil moved from Canada and North Dakota cause gas prices to raise as it would bring more gas and oil to the refineries which would produce more product cause prices to raise?"
1) Those refineries are already producing more product than we're using, which is why they're exporting more product to other countries.
2) If you get Canadian crude down where the crude itself can be exported, the refineries everywhere will have to pay world market prices for it, not domestic market prices. That, in and of itself, is projected to increase the price of gas in the Midwest by about 20¢ a gallon.
|
gemarti

Rookie Author
Quad Cities
Posts:29 Points:2,480 Joined:Jul 2005
|
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2012 7:25:01 PM
I have read articles which say that the tar sand pipeline would not effect prices in the United States. The refineries in the US would refine the product and then pedal it on the world market at currect cartel and Wall Street controlled prices.
I cannot vouch for the accuracy of the paragraph above but I did read it in a credible auto magazine.
Anyway, if it were built, I think they should reroute it to avoid the large acquifers in Nebraska, South Dakota, etc. I don't expect it to lower the prices much at all. We could dump half of the strategic reserve onto the market and the stock market would move upward for a time and the gas prices might drop 5 or 10 cents a gallon until the excess was gone but that would be about it.
We have to find an alternative source of engergy and I don't know why we don'g to with natural gas which can be held in liquid form under pressure. There would be a drop in fuel efficiency but it would be worth it.
|
boops54

Rookie Author
Illinois
Posts:51 Points:33,970 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Mar 4, 2012 5:43:53 PM
Yes, with conditions
|
gmac718

Rookie Author
Iowa
Posts:1 Points:1,320 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 28, 2012 7:43:08 AM
How can have more oil moved from Canada and North Dakota cause gas prices to raise as it would bring more gas and oil to the refineries which would produce more product cause prices to raise? Build the pipe line as the controls are outstanding for the pipelines and I say build it as was planed we have more oil than the Arabs if they will let us get it out of the ground
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 27, 2012 5:24:48 PM
Why raise gas prices by building this pipeline?
|
DutchTreatMI

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:3,446 Points:779,915 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 27, 2012 2:17:30 AM
Yes the Keystone XL Pipeline should be built.
|
DutchTreatMI

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:3,446 Points:779,915 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 27, 2012 2:17:29 AM
Yes the Keystone XL Pipeline should be built.
|
Daveon1946

Rookie Author
British Columbia
Posts:16 Points:1,190 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 1:43:04 PM
yes, go for it
|
AriesMMD

Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:1,571 Points:437,215 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 8:53:20 AM
Just Do It
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 8:29:18 AM
scampster - "Yes, but modify the route, or construction of such to negate risks - we need jobs and the other benefits of such would help too."
The few jobs created by this will have no discernable effect on employment in this country.
And what other benefits? Higher gas prices? More profits for the oil companies?
|
HFAJR0034

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:6,611 Points:1,195,460 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 4:26:22 AM
yes as oringinally proposed.
|
HFAJR0034

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:6,611 Points:1,195,460 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 4:26:12 AM
yes as oringinally proposed.
|
HFAJR0034

Champion Author
New Mexico
Posts:6,611 Points:1,195,460 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Feb 23, 2012 4:26:03 AM
yes as oringinally proposed.
|
scampster

Rookie Author
Illinois
Posts:53 Points:2,910 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 22, 2012 6:22:40 PM
Yes, but modify the route, or construction of such to negate risks - we need jobs and the other benefits of such would help too. Nothing will happen soon though even if kept everything as in the original route proposed. Do it under the best plan in a short period of time if possible.
One need only look to NASA and the Space Shuttle program for what happens if government allows companies to cut corners for the sake of progress faster. Most notable the Challenger under the Reagan administration. I never understood why it took off that cold day, had looked at Good Morning America and heard there would be yet another weather delay, and next I know hours later I hear it blew up. To me the biggest shock ever of something like that happening and end of age of my generation that the USA could do all things good and progress fast. Having not long before that been on a tour of the Kennedy Space Center - and recent opening of EPCOT Center at Disney World - both of which promised we could do space often and fast for a bright future. The Universe of Energy sponsored by Exxon at the time was the most notable of several space shuttle messages presented at EPCOT Center.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 19, 2012 9:54:58 PM
Randy1123CA - "We are idiots if we don't do this"
Considering how much misinformation, disinformation and outright lies we're being fed about this, we're probably idiots if we do do this.
|
Randy1123CA

Rookie Author
Orange County
Posts:9 Points:1,040 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 19, 2012 9:28:27 AM
We are idiots if we don't do this
|
rjr54

Champion Author
Winnipeg
Posts:1,115 Points:395,370 Joined:Feb 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 19, 2012 4:28:13 AM
To AndrewIN, re: YES!! It will create jobs and help us secure a semi-domestic source of oil.
I hate to break this to you, but this is a foreign source of oil. We are on a little better speaking terms with you than say, Iran is with USA. But we are still a separate country.
|
pianomanNE

Rookie Author
Nebraska
Posts:3 Points:371,860 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Feb 18, 2012 8:47:45 AM
As a Nebraskan, I am concerned about impact on the Ogallala aquifer. Since Kestone agreed to move the pipe to the eastern edge of the aquifer, I have fewer reservations than before. The water in the aquifer moves west to east, i believe, and penetration of the aquifer by cride oil is unlikely. So, on balance, I would rather see Canadian oil added to world supplies than Middle eastern oil. Who knows for sure how this will turn out? We hope for the best.
|
jep39

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,182 Points:1,249,760 Joined:Jun 2007
|
Message Posted: Feb 15, 2012 11:05:06 AM
If it is built, it will create some job but where will workers come from.
|
ltalbott2012

Rookie Author
Michigan
Posts:3 Points:410 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 14, 2012 3:13:43 PM
No matter how much gas comes out of the end of that pipe we'll never see lower gas prices. We will need many more holes in the ground than that!
[Edited by: ltalbott2012 at 2/14/2012 6:14:44 PM EST]
|
snowmoose

Rookie Author
Montreal
Posts:17 Points:219,440 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Feb 14, 2012 8:57:54 AM
Yes, but it should follow a different route, some of the grasslands and small natural lakes would be disturbed if they stuck to the original plan, there are other options.
|
samtrans

Rookie Author
Ottawa
Posts:3 Points:7,490 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2012 12:37:08 PM
wow I don't see many posts from Canadians? When politics are involved who know what's really going on... I do agree that this pipeline will not benefit the consumer, our government just wants a piece of the pie that is mostly given to the unethical oil barons of the east and their gold plated sports car while their women are treated like live stock. I honestly would love to see how well they would do selling sand instead of oil. I'm sick and tired of being held hostage by these people, we need oil plain and simple and I would love to buy it only from an ethical country, a country who treats all of their people with respect and dignity. So in the end I'm not sure if this pipeline will create jobs or lower the cost or harm mother nature but we need to stop funding their way of life because I am sure of who is harmed and how, when we buy it from the east.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2012 12:02:32 PM
AndrewIN - "YES!! It will create jobs and help us secure a semi-domestic source of oil."
It will increase the price of gas in Indianapolis by about 20¢ a gallon.
|
AndrewIN

Rookie Author
Indianapolis
Posts:5 Points:430,450 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Feb 13, 2012 6:36:22 AM
YES!! It will create jobs and help us secure a semi-domestic source of oil.
|
rjhenn

Champion Author
Des Moines
Posts:22,614 Points:2,257,260 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Feb 12, 2012 1:31:02 AM
The few jobs this creates will mostly be temporary and insignificant to the economy. The pipeline is going to be built mostly with foreign (mostly Chinese) materials. The products refined from this oil will mostly be sold overseas.
There's no benefit to the US in this project.
|