Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    7:55 PM

Message Forum - Read Message

Category: Religious Debate > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: The ultimate in intolerance Topic is locked Back to Topics
lefty78312

Champion Author
Syracuse

Posts:14,153
Points:2,224,335
Joined:May 2005
Message Posted: Dec 2, 2007 6:48:13 AM

On the evening news last night, they ran a featured segment about the Saudi woman who was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 200 lashes because she was raped by 7 Muslim men. Her original sentence was 90 lashes, but it was increased when she appealed it. I understand that she is still appealing, and one of the judges who might hear her appeal has publicly stated that if it were up to him, he would sentence her to death.

I know some Muslims in this country who decry the harshness of her sentence, but apparently there aren't many in Saudi Arabia. It's religious fanaticism to the nth degree.
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:20,257
Points:3,693,235
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 5:14:04 PM

...or "original sin," the normal collective state of humanity according to Christian teachings.
Profile Pic
trinuclear
Champion Author Albany

Posts:9,779
Points:601,410
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 12:55:58 PM

>>>If the history of humanity were the clinical case history of a single human being, the diagnosis would have to be: chronic paranoid delusions, a pathological propensity to commit murder and acts of extreme violence and cruelty against his perceived “enemies”—his own unconsciousness projected outward.<<<

It is a condition called SIN.
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:20,257
Points:3,693,235
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 12:38:53 PM

Trinuclear,

There is historical, present and future relevance for any religion.

Author Eckhart Tolle, author of “A New Earth” wrote:

>>If we look more deeply into humanity’s ancient religions and spiritual traditions, we will find that underneath the many surface differences there are two core insights that most of them agree on. The words they use to describe those insights differ, yet they all point to a twofold fundamental truth. The first part of this truth is the realization that the “normal” state of mind of most human beings contains a strong element of what we might call dysfunction or even madness…

The collective manifestations of the insanity that lies at the heart of the human condition constitute the greater part of human history. It is to a large extent a history of madness. If the history of humanity were the clinical case history of a single human being, the diagnosis would have to be: chronic paranoid delusions, a pathological propensity to commit murder and acts of extreme violence and cruelty against his perceived “enemies”—his own unconsciousness projected outward. Criminally insane, with a few brief, lucid intervals. <<

Profile Pic
trinuclear
Champion Author Albany

Posts:9,779
Points:601,410
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 12:06:58 PM

Panda, the difference is that your post is completely fabricated and highly unlikely to happen, while there is a very real, clear and present danger from radical Islam.
Profile Pic
Panda
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:20,257
Points:3,693,235
Joined:Feb 2002
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 7:56:42 AM

Reminds me of "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Handmaid's_Tale

>>The Republic of Gilead
The government of the United States was overthrown several years before the opening of the novel. The country has been taken over by Christian fundamentalists who have abrogated the constitution and founded a theocratic state. This Republic of Gilead is ruled through Biblical fundamentalism and rigid enforcement of social roles vaguely resembling Dominionism. Most citizens, and all women, have been stripped of their freedoms. This revolution succeeded because terrorist acts caused the populace to become fearful, suspend criticism of the government, and accept "temporary" measures that became permanent.
This theocracy was planned by conservative Christians, based on their interpretation of Biblical law. The state religion, which draws on an evangelical version of Christianity, is the only system of belief that is allowed. The rulers believe they have a cultural mandate to create and govern this new society, aspects of which are based on harsh interpretations of the Old Testament. For example, the most severe form of punishment is public stoning to death, the so-called "particicution" (participatory execution), similar to justice under the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The military dictatorship has proclaimed martial law as "hordes of guerrillas" are said to roam the countryside. All those who threaten the ideology of Gilead, and those who will not repent — political and religious dissidents, pro-choice advocates (called "abortionists"), and homosexuals (who are accused of "gender treachery") — are executed by hanging and their bodies displayed at "The Wall". Those who do not conform to the new norms are pressed into service as servants or deported to "the colonies", unspecified regions where pollution has reached toxic levels, where they presumably face hard labour and an early death. Women must submit to men and no longer have any civil rights.<<

[Edited by: Panda at 4/2/2008 11:00:22 AM EST]
Profile Pic
trinuclear
Champion Author Albany

Posts:9,779
Points:601,410
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Apr 2, 2008 3:28:40 AM

Report: Non-Muslims Deserve to Be Punished

A report posted on Islam Watch, a site run by Muslims who oppose intolerant teachings and hatred for unbelievers, exposes a prominent Islamic cleric and lawyer who support extreme punishment for non-Muslims — including killing and rape.

A question-and-answer session with Imam Abdul Makin in an East London mosque asks why Allah would tell Muslims to kill and rape innocent non-Muslims, including their wives and daughters, according to Islam Watch.

"Because non-Muslims are never innocent, they are guilty of denying Allah and his prophet," the Imam says, according to the report. "If you don't believe me, here is the legal authority, the top Muslim lawyer of Britain."

The lawyer, Anjem Choudary, backs up the Imam's position, saying that all Muslims are innocent.

"You are innocent if you are a Muslim," Choudary tells the BBC. "Then you are innocent in the eyes of God. If you are not a Muslim, then you are guilty of not believing in God."

Choudary said he would not condemn a Muslim for any action.

"As a Muslim, I must support my Muslim brothers and sisters," Choudary said. "I must have hatred to everything that is not Muslim."

so much for a religion of 'peace'
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:22,434
Points:2,228,950
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Feb 25, 2008 11:46:46 AM

This seems appropriate:

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." William F. Buckley Jr.
Profile Pic
KatmanDo
Champion Author Detroit

Posts:12,803
Points:2,613,260
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 25, 2008 9:31:50 AM

"What I want to know is...What punishment did the 'men' get for raping this poor woman?!?"

While I don't recall the details, I do remember noticing that the men were sentenced to some kind of punishment. You can easily look it up in a search engine if truly interested.


"Cruel and unusual doesn't even begin to describe this one. There is no justification for her sentence!"

One can find examples of barbaric punishment in the Old Testament as well, such as a woman being stoned to death for lying about being a virgin. Think of it as an example of folk simply following their religion without question.
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:22,434
Points:2,228,950
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Feb 24, 2008 8:21:49 PM

How incredibly intolerant of other cultures!
Profile Pic
stereomom
Champion Author Greensboro

Posts:18,144
Points:2,902,735
Joined:May 2004
Message Posted: Feb 22, 2008 9:32:09 AM

What I want to know is...What punishment did the 'men' get for raping this poor woman?!?

Cruel and unusual doesn't even begin to describe this one. There is no justification for her sentence!
Profile Pic
KatmanDo
Champion Author Detroit

Posts:12,803
Points:2,613,260
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 21, 2008 9:22:06 PM

"they ran a featured segment about the Saudi woman who was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 200 lashes because she was raped by 7 Muslim men."

As I understand it, she received her sentence for going in a car with unrelated males, NOT because she was raped. An analogy would be to punish one's child for playing in the street or for crossing a busy street without first looking both ways, NOT because the child then gets injured by a vehicle as the result of doing so.
Profile Pic
bam15
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:6,068
Points:1,147,170
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Feb 14, 2008 8:46:17 AM

Talk about cruel and unusual...OUCH!!
Topic is locked Back to Topics